Posts Tagged harassment court case

Hostile Environment Harassment Court Cases

Here are example hostile environment sexual harassment court cases. These cases were completed by the EEOC.

Hostile Work Environment

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced a settlement with London International Group, LLC (LIG) in a lawsuit charging the Eufaula-based plant, which manufactures condoms, with subjecting a class of employees to a hostile work environment in which they have been subjected to numerous racially and sexually derogatory cartoons and comments since 1995.

Award:             $625,000 in monetary damages 


EEOC v. Cheap Tickets, et al., Case Number CV-02–7117-WJR (VBKx) alleges that, dating back to 2000; female agents working at Cheap Tickets’ Los Angeles Call Center were subjected to a sexually hostile work environment by their supervisors. Moreover, EEOC says that the woman who filed the initial discrimination charge was subjected to retaliation.

Award:             $1,100,000 in monetary damages 


Gurtz, an electrical subcontractor, and defendant Pickus, a general construction contractor, subjected female workers to a sexually hostile work environment. The complaint alleged that Pickus and Gurtz permitted sexually explicit and offensive graffiti about women in portable toilets and in other areas of the construction site and ignored sexually offensive remarks made to the charging party, a female electrician employed by Gurtz, who was an explicit target of some of the graffiti.

Award:             $50,000 in compensatory damage


In this Title VII suit, the San Francisco District Office alleged that a female charging party and two other female restaurant employees were subjected to physical and verbal sexual harassment by their supervisor. Defendant, a high-end restaurant in Hawaii, took no corrective action despite two of the women’s complaints to the general manager and thus the conduct continued. However, after a complaint by the third woman to corporate headquarters, defendant investigated the matter and fired the supervisor.

Award:             $245,000 in monetary damages


Supermercados Conchita, a supermarket chain in Puerto Rico, subjected charging party to same-sex sexual harassment. The male owner/general manager of the supermarkets subjected charging party (who had been hired as a bagger but was rapidly moved into management) to sexual comments, inappropriate touching, and sexual invitations.

Award:             $142,500 in monetary damages


Don’t end up in a lawsuit — train your supervisors and employees online!  Online Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Courses

Tags: ,

Quid Pro Quo Harassment Court Cases

Not sure whether the issue of sexual harassment will effect you? Look at some of these Quid Pro Quo court cases and monetary awards:

Quid Pro Quo

Fifteen women were sexually harassed.  CEO of Del Laboratories of Farmingdale, N.Y, who occupied the most powerful position in the company, sought sexual favors in return for job benefits or opportunities, either by making promises to the women he harassed or by threatening them with unfavorable conditions if they refused his advancements. The case also contains hostile work environment issues, as well as, retaliation

Award:             $1,185,000 in monetary relief


Quid Pro Quo

Rivera Vineyards and its affiliates engaged in a pattern or practice of sexually harassing female workers and making job assignments based on sex; defendants also retaliated against women who complained about harassment. The harassment consisted of sexual comments, unwelcome rubbing and touching, offers of better assignments in exchange for sex, and in at least one case, forced submission to sexual intercourse.

Award:             $1,050,000 in monetary damages 


Quid Pro Quo (Sexual Favors)

A company which sells discounted leisure travel products subjected a group of female employees working at its Los Angeles call center to a sexually hostile working environment. The harassment included unwelcome touching, propositions for sexual favors and sexually charged speech from two male supervisors. The lawsuit further alleged that the defendant discharged the female employee who filed the initial charge of discrimination in retaliation for complaining about the harassment.

Award:             $1,100,000 in monetary damages


Protect yourself from lawsuits with economical, online training.  Train your supervisors and employees today!  Online Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Courses

Source: http://eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/

Tags: , ,

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes